Benzene and 1,3-butadiene concs at the rdside - appendix 2 Appendix 2 Statistical Comparison of Annual Means

CONTENTS
A2.1 Introduction
A2.2 Long Term Trends
A2.3 Previous Work


A2.1 Introduction
First it is important to clarify several definitions. An annual mean is the mean taken across any annual period. For convenience this is usually done across a calendar year, and is commonly referred to as a fixed annual mean. The use of the term "maximum annual running mean" is misleading, as the period across which the running mean is being considered is not specified. The term is intended to refer to the maximum annual running mean from a dataset consisting of one year of running means (which requires two years worth of data). In addition, periods are quoted as time ending- i.e. running means from 01/01/94 - 01/01/95 through until
31/12/94 - 31/12/95 would give the maximum running annual mean for 1995. The "fixed" average across the period 01/01/1995 to 31/12/1995 (inclusive) is labelled as 1995.

So, the comparison between a "fixed" annual mean, and the maximum value from a dataset of one years worth of annual running means may be visualised as follows:-

1995 á  
  Average taken across all  
  instantaneous values à "Fixed Annual" Mean
1996 â  


1994 ­              
  ½ ­            
  ½ ½ ­          
  ½ ½ ½ ­        
  ¯ ½ ½ ½ ­      
1995   ¯ ½ ½ ½ ­    
      ¯ ½ ½ ½ ­  
        ¯ ½ ½ ½  
          ¯ ½ ½  
            ¯ ½ à Maximum value from a "years
1996             ¯ worth" of annual running means
(annual running means generated from instantaneous values)

Due to the large amounts of data involved, the "fixed" annual mean, and the maximum value from a dataset of one years worth of annual running means were calculated from daily average data, rather than instantaneous values. This is considered to have little impact on the results. Only days with data capture in excess of 75% were used, and only annual periods with data capture in excess of 75% were used.

A2.2 Long Term Trends
There is a complicating factor which arises during this comparison. If the measured concentrations are generally falling with time, then the annual running means are expected to decrease with time. As a result the relationship between the two parameters skewed. The maximum running annual mean would be expected to occur towards the start of the annual period (in the above example: the mean from January '94 to January '95). The "fixed" annual average will give a lower value.

A2.3 Previous Work
Work conducted in the report "Investigation into the use of Surrogate Pollutant Statistics for Local Authority Air Quality Review and Assessment" (Draft- March 1998 A Loader, P Willis and G Broughton) considered Benzene and 1,3-Butadiene data from several sources across the period 1994 to 1996. The following conclusions were reached:-

"The benzene maximum running annual mean can be accurately estimated from fixed annual mean measurements".

"The 1,3-butadiene maximum running annual mean can accurately be predicted from fixed annual mean measurements."

The following relationships were arrived at:-

Benzene
Max. Annual Running Mean = 1.1015 Annual Calendar Mean + 0.0198
(R² = 0.9328)

1,3-Butadiene
Max. Annual Running Mean = 1.0075 Annual Calendar Mean + 0.0291
(R² = 0.7907)


A2.4 Results
Results from the current statistical analysis are shown in Figure A2.1 and Figure A2.2. In summary the following relationships were found:-

Benzene
Max. Annual Running Mean = 1.102 Annual Calendar Mean - 0.004
(R² = 0.960)

1,3-Butadiene
Max. Annual Running Mean = 1.022 Annual Calendar Mean + 0.016
(R² = 0.933)


The following summarises the date corresponding to the maximum value of the running means across the sites and years used for the statistical analysis above. It appears that an unusually high proportion of the dates for benzene occur at the start of the calendar year, indicating that concentrations are falling (see Section A2.2 above). This trend for 1,3-butadiene is less evident. However, without further, more in depth, statistical analysis it is not possible to confirm whether this trend is significant.

Table A2a Date for Max. Running Annual Mean - Benzene
Site Name 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 (to21/08)
Belfast 01-Jan 02-Jan 07-Apr 04-Dec 01-Jan
Birmingham 06-Jan 12-Dec 07-Oct 07-Nov 01-Jan
Bristol 24-Dec 31-Dec 07-Apr 12-Nov 01-Jan
Cardiff 08-Jan 03-Jan 16-Apr 04-Dec 06-Jan
Edinburgh 01-Jan 29-Dec 11-Apr 31-Jan 01-Jan
Harwell   03-Jan 17-Apr 05-Dec 28-Apr
Leeds   05-Jan 26-Sep 04-Dec 01-Jan
London UCL 08-Jan 03-Jan 08-Oct 13-Nov 01-Jan
London Eltham 08-Jan 04-Feb 08-Oct 13-Nov 01-Jan
Liverpool   12-Dec 02-Jan 23-Dec 01-Jan
Middlesbrough 12-Nov 01-Jan 23-Apr 09-Nov 03-Jan
Marylebone Rd         15-Feb
Southampton   14-Sep 05-Jan 13-Nov 01-Jan


Table A2b Date for Max. Running Annual Mean - 1,3-Butadiene
Site Name 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 (to21/08)
Belfast 27-Dec 12-Dec 07-Apr 04-Dec 24-May
Birmingham 24-Dec 12-Dec 07-Oct 07-Jun 08-Mar
Bristol   31-Dec 04-Apr 20-Aug 03-Jul
Cardiff 24-Dec 02-Jan 22-Apr 20-Feb 27-Jul
Edinburgh 14-Dec 29-Dec 02-Apr 31-Jan  
Harwell     18-Oct 24-Jan  
Leeds   29-Dec 03-Sep 31-Jul  
London UCL 11-Nov 01-Jan 17-Apr 29-Jan 01-Mar
London Eltham   12-Dec 29-Feb 13-Nov 07-Jan
Liverpool     06-Dec 13-May  
Middlesbrough   29-Aug 09-Apr 19-Feb  
Marylebone Rd          
Southampton     04-Jul 28-Jan  

 To appendix 1To contents pageTo appendix 3